Dear Friend,

If you know someone that needs to be added to this policy briefing, please let us know by sending an e-mail here:  info@puregrassroots.org.

The United States' Support for Ukraine: Current Strategies and Future Prospects under a Trump Administration

Introduction

Since Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the subsequent outbreak of conflict in eastern Ukraine, the United States has played a pivotal role in supporting Ukraine. This support, encompassing military aid, economic assistance, and diplomatic backing, has evolved over the years to counter Russian aggression and bolster Ukraine’s sovereignty. The Biden administration has intensified these efforts, particularly in the wake of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. However, a potential Trump administration—should the former president return to power—is likely to recalibrate this support significantly. This paper explores the current nature of U.S. assistance to Ukraine, analyzes its effectiveness, and examines how a Trump administration might alter the trajectory of this support. The analysis employs historical context, logical frameworks, and comprehensive evidence to provide an in-depth understanding of the topic.

Current U.S. Support for Ukraine

Military Assistance

The cornerstone of U.S. support for Ukraine has been substantial military aid. Since the onset of the conflict in 2014, and particularly following the Russian invasion in 2022, the United States has provided billions of dollars in military assistance. By December 2023, the Biden administration had allocated over $60 billion in security assistance to Ukraine, including advanced weaponry such as HIMARS rocket systems, Javelin anti-tank missiles, and Patriot missile defense systems.¹

This military aid is designed to enhance Ukraine’s defensive capabilities and counter Russian advances. Notably, the U.S. Department of Defense initiated the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI) to provide training, equipment, and intelligence support. Additionally, the Lend-Lease Act of 2022 facilitated expedited arms transfers to Ukraine, reminiscent of the original Lend-Lease program during World War II.²

Economic and Humanitarian Aid

Beyond military support, the U.S. has committed significant economic and humanitarian resources to Ukraine. Economic aid includes direct budgetary support to the Ukrainian government, assistance for energy infrastructure repairs, and funding for agricultural resilience. For instance, in 2023, the United States provided $18 billion in direct financial assistance to help Ukraine maintain governmental functions during wartime.³ Humanitarian efforts focus on addressing the displacement crisis, with the U.S. contributing to international relief agencies and NGOs to assist the millions of Ukrainians displaced internally and abroad.´

Diplomatic and Strategic Support

The United States’ diplomatic efforts aim to isolate Russia on the global stage while rallying international support for Ukraine. This includes imposing stringent economic sanctions on Russian entities and individuals, advocating for Ukraine’s NATO aspirations, and strengthening transatlantic alliances through NATO and the European Union.µ President Biden’s visit to Kyiv in February 2023 underscored the symbolic and strategic importance of U.S. commitment to Ukraine’s cause.

Effectiveness and Challenges of Current Support

Effectiveness

U.S. support has significantly bolstered Ukraine’s ability to resist Russian aggression. Ukrainian forces, equipped with advanced U.S. weaponry, successfully repelled major Russian offensives, including the liberation of key territories like Kharkiv and Kherson in late 2022.· Furthermore, economic and humanitarian aid has mitigated the impact of war on Ukraine’s civilian population, sustaining morale and societal cohesion.¸

Challenges

Despite these successes, challenges persist. Critics argue that prolonged U.S. involvement risks escalating the conflict into a broader NATO-Russia confrontation. Domestically, some factions in the U.S. question the sustainability of extensive aid amid rising fiscal concerns. Public support for aid to Ukraine, while initially robust, has shown signs of waning, particularly among certain political groups.¹ Additionally, concerns about corruption in Ukraine’s government have led to calls for stricter oversight of U.S. assistance.¹¹

Prospects Under a Trump Administration

Potential Policy Shifts

Donald Trump’s previous presidency (2017–2021) and subsequent statements provide insights into how a renewed Trump administration might approach U.S. support for Ukraine. Trump has consistently emphasized an "America First" foreign policy, prioritizing domestic interests over international engagements. During his presidency, Trump was criticized for delaying military aid to Ukraine in 2019, a decision that became central to his first impeachment.¹¹¹

A Trump administration is likely to reassess military aid levels, potentially reducing or conditioning assistance on European allies taking greater responsibility. Trump has frequently criticized NATO members for not contributing their fair share to collective defense efforts, suggesting that he may pressure European nations to shoulder a larger burden in supporting Ukraine.ⁱ⁰

Impact on Military Assistance

Under Trump, military aid could shift from high-profile, high-cost systems to more limited, defensive-oriented support. Trump’s skepticism toward entangling alliances and foreign interventions suggests a potential reluctance to sustain large-scale arms transfers. However, his administration’s willingness to provide lethal aid in 2018, including Javelin missiles, indicates that complete withdrawal of military assistance is unlikely.ⁱ¹

Diplomatic and Strategic Adjustments

Trump’s approach to Russia has been marked by a mix of personal overtures to Vladimir Putin and the imposition of sanctions during his presidency. A renewed Trump administration might pursue a diplomatic resolution to the Ukraine conflict, potentially advocating for negotiations that involve territorial concessions by Ukraine—a stance that could strain U.S.-Ukraine relations.ⁱ²

Domestic and International Ramifications

Domestically, a reduction in U.S. support for Ukraine under Trump could exacerbate partisan divisions. Internationally, it could weaken NATO cohesion and embolden Russia, undermining global perceptions of U.S. reliability as an ally. Conversely, Trump’s emphasis on burden-sharing might incentivize European allies to enhance their contributions, potentially offsetting reductions in U.S. aid.ⁱ³

Comparative Analysis of Biden and Trump Policies

The Biden administration’s approach reflects a commitment to multilateralism and sustained engagement in Ukraine, contrasting sharply with Trump’s transactional and unilateral tendencies. While Biden’s policies prioritize countering authoritarianism and upholding international norms, Trump’s potential policies may focus on cost-efficiency and strategic retrenchment.ⁱ´ The implications of these divergent approaches extend beyond Ukraine, shaping the broader geopolitical landscape and U.S. foreign policy credibility.

Conclusion

The United States’ support for Ukraine represents a critical juncture in the nation’s foreign policy, balancing strategic interests, ideological commitments, and domestic considerations. Under the Biden administration, this support has been robust, multifaceted, and effective in countering Russian aggression. However, a potential Trump administration could introduce significant changes, prioritizing cost-efficiency and diplomatic resolution over sustained military and economic assistance. The future of U.S. support for Ukraine will not only influence the trajectory of the conflict but also define America’s role in upholding the global order.

Footnotes